Un-Diplomatic

Un-Diplomatic

Share this post

Un-Diplomatic
Un-Diplomatic
Part II: A “Hard Break” with China is Far-Right Accelerationism
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Part II: A “Hard Break” with China is Far-Right Accelerationism

The idea of decoupling from China forsakes democracy. For the far right, that’s the point

Un-Diplomatic
Feb 05, 2024
∙ Paid
10

Share this post

Un-Diplomatic
Un-Diplomatic
Part II: A “Hard Break” with China is Far-Right Accelerationism
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
11
3
Share

Read Part One here.


The original post on this topic:

  • Established the MAGA right’s consensus in favor of an economic “hard break” with China;

  • Walked through how decoupling is a loser on its own terms, serving none of the goals that its advocates suggest; and

  • Made the case that every argument in favor of full decoupling misunderstands capitalism itself.

In this post, I’m focusing more squarely on the far-right accelerationist logic of decoupling.

There are two aspects to this—1) the amplification of militarism and the increased likelihood of war that follows from a “hard break,” and 2) the consolidation of reactionary political power that “hard break” policies facilitate. And, of course, war and far-right power consolidation feed each other.

Let me explain.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Van Jackson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More