Un-Diplomatic

Un-Diplomatic

Share this post

Un-Diplomatic
Un-Diplomatic
To Be A China Hawk...
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

To Be A China Hawk...

Promoting bad vibes and dubious analysis, all the way down.

Un-Diplomatic
Aug 08, 2024
∙ Paid
8

Share this post

Un-Diplomatic
Un-Diplomatic
To Be A China Hawk...
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
6
2
Share
Image

“Diplomatic engagement is a threat.”

“MAGA is isolationist.”

“America must ‘balance’ Chinese power.”

“Cold War 2 is already happening and we must win it.”

“Trump was a China dove and Obama’s pivot to Asia was ‘largely rhetorical.’”

These are just a few of the very real assertions frequently bandied about by China hawks. All of them, in fact, appear in a single recent post by pundit Noah Smith, an econ guy who has become known the past few years primarily for taking a very hawkish turn on China policy.

But every single proposition he makes here is false.

There is, of course, a chasm between how I see Asia, China, and American power compared with how folks like Noah Smith or John Bolton see these things. But on this occasion, I’d like to try something other than harangue or mock, because while everyone knows I think such sentiments are wild-eyed and irresponsible, you deserve a little explanation (or perhaps reminder) of why.

In this post, let me take each of the concrete propositions one at a time. You can then decide whether I’m giving them a fair shake. In a subsequent post, I’ll address the meta-arguments dealing with the nature of the China “problem,” which also rest on dubious grounds.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Van Jackson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More